Skip to content

Hawaii total-loss rules

12 of 12 confirmed against primary sources

Last checked Sep 5, 2026 · ClaimMath research desk

Every fact below is quoted from the regulation or statute it cites. Where the primary sources do not settle a point, it is marked and left open rather than filled in — which is itself worth knowing before you argue it.

When a car counts as a total loss

confirmed: no rule
No percentage located. Hawaii's insurance code prescribes the SETTLEMENT method for a total loss (HRS §§ 431:10C-309 to 311) without defining when a vehicle becomes one; the choice between the replacement method and the cash settlement method is what the statute governs.
“When a motor vehicle insurance policy provides for the adjustment and settlement of an insured's motor vehicle's total losses on the basis of actual cash value or replacement, the insurer shall follow either the replacement method set forth in section 431:10C-310 or the cash settlement method set forth in section 431:10C-311.”

Recorded as an absence on the threshold question after reading §§ 431:10C-309, 310 and 311: all three assume a total loss has occurred and regulate what follows. Hawaii's salvage-title definition sits in the motor vehicle code (HRS ch. 286) and was not read directly. The structural point is that Hawaii regulates the SETTLEMENT tightly while leaving the total-loss decision to the policy.

HRS § 431:10C-309 · checked Sep 6, 2026 · source

How the settlement must be valued

Two statutory methods, and the insurer must follow one of them: the replacement method at § 431:10C-310, or the cash settlement method at § 431:10C-311. On a cash settlement the figure must be based on the retail value of the vehicle as determined from a source or sources reflective of market value.
“The cash settlement shall be based upon the retail value of the motor vehicle as determined from a source or sources which are reflective of the market value”

RETAIL value, not wholesale or trade-in — stated in the statute. The plural 'source or sources' matters alongside § 431:10C-311(a)(2), which bars dealer quotations and newspaper advertisements from being 'sole sources reflective of market values'. Under the replacement method the claim file must contain a description of the replacement vehicle including its VIN and a schedule of options (§ 431:10C-310), which is a documentary standard a claimant can ask about.

HRS § 431:10C-309; § 431:10C-311(a)(1) · checked Sep 6, 2026 · source

How comparables must be chosen

Hawaii constrains the SOURCES rather than the comparables. Dealer quotations may be used only when the vehicle is available at the quoting dealer's lot, and dealer quotations and newspaper advertisements may be used in lieu of the insurer's usual source but may NOT be treated as sole sources reflective of market value. Hawaii sets no minimum count, distance, recency window or mileage tolerance.
“The use of dealer quotations (when the vehicle is available at the quoting dealer's lot) and newspaper advertisements may be used in lieu of the source generally used by the insurer”

Two checkable points despite the absence of numbers. A dealer quotation is only usable if the vehicle is actually ON THE LOT — so a quote for a car the dealer does not have is outside the statute. And neither dealer quotes nor advertisements may stand alone, so a valuation resting solely on advertisements departs from the rule on its face. That second point is rare in this ledger and directly useful against a thin comparables set.

HRS § 431:10C-311(a)(2) · checked Sep 6, 2026 · source

What the insurer must show you

confirmed: no rule
No express duty located to hand the claimant the valuation. What the statute does require is documentation IN THE CLAIM FILE — under the replacement method a description of the replacement vehicle with its VIN and a schedule of options, and under the cash method a record where the insurer departs from its usual valuation source.
“The claim file, which is maintained by the insurer, shall contain a description of the replacement vehicle, including the vehicle identification number and a schedule of options”

Recorded as partial: the duties attach to the claim FILE rather than to what is handed over, the same shape as Colorado, Missouri, Tennessee and Kansas. The material therefore exists by statute but is not owed to you automatically. Ask in writing and date the request — and where the insurer departed from its usual source, § 431:10C-311(a)(2) requires the file to reflect why, which is a specific thing to ask for.

HRS § 431:10C-310(1); § 431:10C-311(a)(2) · checked Sep 6, 2026 · source

Sales tax

confirmed: no rule
No rule located. Neither the total-loss statutes (HRS §§ 431:10C-309 to 311) nor the Insurance Division's motor vehicle rules (HAR chapter 16-23) require an insurer to include general excise tax in a total-loss settlement; the argument rests on the policy's value standard rather than on a state rule.

Hawaii charges general excise tax rather than a sales tax, and nothing in the total-loss statutes or the motor vehicle insurance rules makes the insurer pay it. Chapter 16-23 of the administrative rules was read in full and never mentions a total loss, tax or fees. Guides that describe a Hawaii rule reimbursing tax on a replacement bought within 30 days are describing something no primary source contains; the 30 days in Hawaii law is the recourse window in § 431:10C-311(b), which is about finding a comparable vehicle, not about tax.

HRS §§ 431:10C-309, 310, 311 (silent as to excise tax); HAR ch. 16-23 (silent) · checked Sep 6, 2026 · source

Title and registration fees

confirmed: no rule
No rule located. Nothing in the total-loss statutes or the motor vehicle insurance rules requires an insurer to include ownership, registration or transfer fees in a total-loss settlement.

Same reading as for tax: the statutes and chapter 16-23 were read for a fee provision and contain none. Some policy forms include these fees as a matter of contract, which is a policy question rather than a Hawaii requirement.

HRS §§ 431:10C-309, 310, 311 (silent as to fees); HAR ch. 16-23 (silent) · checked Sep 6, 2026 · source

Appraisal clause

Named in the statute as one of the permitted responses. Where the insured cannot buy a comparable vehicle at the determined market value within 30 days but has located one costing more, the insurer may pay the difference, purchase the vehicle, USE APPRAISAL, or reopen the claim file.
“The insurer may conclude the loss settlement as provided for under the appraisal section of the insurance contract in force at the time of loss. This appraisal shall be considered as binding against both parties”

Hawaii's 30-day recourse right lists the policy's appraisal provision among the insurer's permitted responses, alongside paying the difference, buying the located vehicle, or reopening the file; an appraisal concluded this way binds both parties. That puts Hawaii closer to Kansas and Maryland than to the pure reopen-the-file rights in California, New Jersey, Washington, Kentucky, Oregon and Iowa. The window is 30 days, not 35.

HRS § 431:10C-311(b)(3) · checked Sep 6, 2026 · source

Claim-handling deadlines

Respond to claim communications within 15 working days; affirm or deny coverage within a reasonable time after proof of loss (no day count); offer payment within 30 calendar days of affirming liability where the amount is determined and not in dispute; give a written explanation of delay on any claim unresolved 30 calendar days after it was reported.
“Failing to offer payment within thirty calendar days of affirmation of liability, if the amount of the claim has been determined and is not in dispute”

Two cautions. The 30-day payment clock applies only where the amount is 'determined and is not in dispute', which a contested total-loss valuation is not, so it is weaker than it looks in a valuation fight. And these are unfair-practice definitions that bite when committed with such frequency as to indicate a general business practice; three written complaints to the commissioner in twelve months create a rebuttable presumption of that, which is one reason a regulator complaint is worth filing. Hawaii's statutory total-loss sections (§§ 431:10C-309 to 311) set no clock of their own.

HRS § 431:13-103(a)(11)(B), (E), (F), (G) · checked Sep 6, 2026 · source

Unfair claims practices law

HRS § 431:13-103 (unfair methods of competition and unfair or deceptive acts or practices defined), with the total-loss settlement methods separately mandated by HRS §§ 431:10C-309 to 311.
“the insurer shall follow either the replacement method set forth in section 431:10C-310 or the cash settlement method set forth in section 431:10C-311.”

The quote is from § 431:10C-309, the mandatory-method provision — the strongest structural feature of Hawaii's scheme, because the insurer has no third option. § 431:13-103 itself was not retrieved, so its qualifier and remedies are not recorded here. Hawaii is also a no-fault state, which shapes the wider chapter but not the total-loss settlement rules quoted in this row.

HRS § 431:13-103(a)(11); §§ 431:10C-309 to 311 · checked Sep 6, 2026 · source

Time limit to sue your own insurer

6 years
“Actions for the recovery of any debt founded upon any contract, obligation, or liability, excepting such as are brought upon the judgment or decree of a court”

Six years on a contract. Check the policy for a shorter suit-limitation clause; whether Hawaii enforces them in a personal auto policy is not established here.

HRS § 657-1(1) · checked Sep 6, 2026 · source

Where to file a complaint

“We encourage consumers to speak with an Insurance Division investigator before filing a complaint. In some cases, a resolution is possible without filing a formal complaint with the division.”

Call 1-844-808-3222 (7:45am–4:30pm HST) to speak with an investigator first; the online complaint form is linked from this page.

Hawaii Insurance Division (DCCA) — Filing a Complaint · checked Sep 6, 2026 · source

State regulator

Hawaii Insurance Division (Department of Commerce and Consumer Affairs)
“Our mission at the Department of Commerce and Consumer Affairs is to protect Hawaiʻi's consumers and service its business community with respect and fairness to the interests of both.”

The Insurance Division sits inside the Department of Commerce and Consumer Affairs, whose site hosts the complaint page.

Hawaii Insurance Division, DCCA · checked Sep 6, 2026 · source

Open questions on this row (2)

These are the things we could not settle from primary sources. They are published rather than hidden, because a reader arguing this rule should know where it thins out.

  • Not yet read at the source: the salvage or total-loss vehicle definition in HRS ch. 286 to establish whether Hawaii has any titling threshold at all.
  • Establish how the 'determined and not in dispute' qualifier on the 30-day payment duty is applied to a contested total-loss valuation — the same question that is open for Iowa.

Guides that apply in Hawaii

Ordered by how firm Hawaii’s footing is on each subject.

States that handle this the same way

These also have no sales-tax rule either way.

Delaware, Idaho, Indiana, Louisiana, Massachusetts, Michigan, Mississippi

All states, side by side

What your insurer says

Hawaii’s rules bind every insurer equally. What each one publishes about its own method is quoted from its claims pages.

GEICO, State Farm, Progressive, Allstate, USAA, Liberty Mutual